Monday, February 2, 2015

How About a Shot of Reality with That Juice Box?

Let no one have contempt for your youth, but set an example for those who believe, in speech, conduct, love, faith, and purity. - 1 Timothy 4:12
Earlier this month congressional Republicans cancelled a bill restricting abortions after 20 weeks, a law that would have been a huge victory for the pro-life movement. The recent fallout has seen Catholics assessing their loyalty to the GOP and pondering strategies for the future. Recently Crisis published the latest installment of this, a long rant by Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM) leader Austin Ruse entitled "Abortion, Torture, and the Juice Box Theologians."

Ruse treads familiar ground, worrying that Catholic disenchantment with the GOP will dilute what little political clout we have. He raises a fair point, about torture debates creating "single issue voters." Mostly, though, he channels his political disappointment into personal internet feuds, bringing up 2010 debates about the morality of waterboarding. Although some Catholics are increasingly disenchanted at how neither political party fully represents their values, he denounces those who put too much emphasis on the death penalty or a living wage over the pro-life cause.

Sadly, Ruse talks about abortion like it exists in a vacuum. It's a comic book villain holding America in a tractor beam, and if pro-lifers can finally deal it a death-blow with their unreliable laser guns, everyone will shake off the hypnosis and society will live happily ever after. His personal solution to America's moral woes is the repeal of various taxes coupled with "a national campaign out of the White House encouraging people to finish high school, get married, go to church, and have babies."

How exactly would a nation of high school graduates working low minimum wage jobs afford to feed their babies or pay for child care while they work multiple jobs? That version of the Culture of Life doesn't sound very flourishing, let alone sustainable. Such a short-sighted approach ignores the multitude of social and economic factors that make women think abortion is their best option, none of which will magically disappear if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Unless we address the challenges that make parenthood seem impossible, legal pro-life victory will be superficial and fleeting. As one Catholic mom wisely put it, "Want to save the babies? Save their mothers."

Ruse puts his faith in procreation propaganda rather than a nuanced sense of morality and ethics. Instead of taking a holistic outlook that considers respect for any human life beneficial, whether prisoners or laborers or babies, he insists Catholics should only have a one-track mind. If he had been alive in the 1830s, would he have told people to shut up about the Trail of Tears or working conditions at the Lowell mills because Slavery? Would he have considered a White House campaign saying “Be nice to black people” sufficient for post-Civil War reconstruction?

If Ruse wants an intelligent debate about political loyalties, that's fine, But he doesn't offer that here, just an ad hominem screed. Dredging up an obscure beef with group blog Vox Nova, he calls them "Juice-box theologians, that is, mostly young newly minted but largely unemployed PhDs." Apparently these whipper-snappers too incompetent to handle full-time jobs or adult beverages are somehow also at the heart of a vast and dangerous conspiracy to lure Catholics away from their GOP alliances.

Someone hold my earrings because I need to throw. Down. This kind of name-calling is uncalled for, and I can’t believe the editors of  Crisis were willing to print it. I don't know the terms of Ruse's dispute with Vox Nova, but even if the site is in the wrong, this is a terrible rebuttal on many levels. Saying "my opponent is young and underemployed, and therefore incorrect" is just campaign spin. Such smug self-importance supports the old liberal saw that pro-lifers only care about people until they are born; after that you’re on your own. But that's the thing with babies - after their mothers choose life, they learn to talk, read, and write.

Here’s a group of people who have done exactly what Ruse thinks Americans should do: they finished school, and cared enough about churchgoing to spend years studying theology. But that’s not good enough, because they dared to be born decades after him and enter the workforce during a broken economy and academic system.

My husband and I are among many young Catholic couples who fit this category. We’re church-going, contraception-eschewing people who thought pondering the Good, the True, and the Beautiful was our vocation – and now low-paying adjunct gigs are among our only options. Through blood, sweat, and tears, we’re working hard to build fulfilling lives for our little families. If middle class financial security is the barometer of spiritual legitimacy, please let us know and we can call ourselves radical Calvinists to save time.

This is the dilemma facing my Millennial generation: even if we followed all the rules, we've run into unexpected economic challenges and then are told it’s our own fault and we should know our place. People bemoan how the Kids Today aren't devoted to the Church, but then don't fully engage with those of us who have stuck around. If some of us don't share his political ideas, Ruse would rather we just disappeared into the wilderness. "Let’s have a modern day land-rush for all those Distributists out there who are just itching to fish, farm or make cheese—though one suspects they’ll stay exactly where they are, blogging and adjunct teaching."

While he retains his own career as an online journalist, I presume? Apparently Ruse thinks the generations after him don't deserve to aspire to his urban intellectual life. Considering that he once proclaimed that liberal academics "should be taken out and shot," he’s letting us off pretty easy. Still, his pompous attitude makes me question his moral judgement and frankly, feel a little betrayed.

Once upon a time, when I was just a juice box historian in high school, I wrote a report on the Holy See's permanent observer status at the United Nations. Ruse's articles were a major source for the project, and I looked up to him as a Catholic intellectual. I dreamed that one day I would be like him and get my words published on the internet. Now I realize he'd probably mock me for the 18 months I spent working temp gigs while I endlessly searched for a job in my MA field. Since he doesn't even want me here unless I’m drinking his Kool-Aid, I’ll stick to whiskey. Every grad student knows it's an important tool for surviving a PhD program.

9 comments:

  1. Yes, this. I have been struggling financially since graduating from college and have been underemployed since. It's so hard and people tell me it's my fault. The truth is there aren't jobs and I've had to make do with working multiple low paying ones, which still don't pay everything. I felt like my chosen field was my vocation, too, and it's heart wrenching that I don't have a proper job in my field. I have no health insurance or benefits of any kind, no huge savings, and no way to get out. When I go to mass, looking for community with Catholics my age, the married parents ignore and exclude me so I am even lacking support of friends. It's a constant struggle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing your story - it sounds a lot like what many people of our generation are going through. It's extra discouraging the people around you don't really get it. I hope things get better for you!

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Thanks, friend! It feels good to get back in the saddle.

      Delete
  3. Aside from his tone, one of his major mistakes is to assume that our votes are the property of the Republican Party, and that consequently if we withhold our support because the GOP fields candidates who are unacceptable, we have somehow stolen from them.

    At any rate, I'm tired of hearing "single-issue voters" maligned, in no small part because most of them are not single-issue voters: they are AND-gate voters. To be worthy of my vote, you must oppose abortion AND "gay marriage" AND torture -- among other things. Two out of three is not good enough; nine out of ten is not good enough. The reason I dropped my NRA membership years ago is I realized they were single-issue voters who would happily support a pro-abortion candidate if he were also pro-gun.

    By the way, the Church is very AND-gate about important matters, too. One must believe that Christ is truly God AND that He is truly man AND that He literally rose from the dead AND that He was born of a Virgin, among other things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting point about the "checkboxes" for the nature of Christ. I guess we Catholics are just a picky bunch! ;-)

      Delete
  4. I read his article, and, as someone who generally agrees with him, was a bit disappointed. Talk about juice-box drinkers, Austin needs to step away from the GOP kool-aid. Since when is being played for suckers since 1973 considered pro-life? He himself admits, sote voce, that the GOP kinda, maybe, sorta could have done more in the time it controlled the levers of power, but hey DEMONCRATS! Ok, sure, Democrats are worse on a myriad of issues - his point? The GOP, like the Dems, understands one thing - power. The Dems need abortion because it's what their constituents want; the GOP needs abortion because it's what their constituents will vote against. If the GOP can't muster enough to get a 20 wk ban passed, if they can't at least block bad SCOTUS candidates (much less elect decent pro-life ones), then forget them. If the GOP had half as much commitment to ending abortion that Dems have to keeping it, it would have been a thing of the past decades ago. Austin ruse indeed. And since when is getting involved in unnecessary wars of minimal importance? Maybe if we weren't spending billions fighting other people's wars and propping up various monsters around the world, we'd have enough to take care of own - maybe even with a tax cut or two.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sometimes I feel that people like Austin Ruse are putting their ideological loyalties before their faith. Ideologies, as one writer quotes it, are "secular religions", and putting them in front of anything else including faith is essentially idolatry.

    That's why I choose to put my Catholic principles in front when it comes to political issues. For too long people have connected their religious beliefs with their ideologies when they're supposed to have their religious beliefs held paramount above their other beliefs.

    ReplyDelete